| 网站首页 | 考研信息中心 | 考研资料下载 | 考研论坛 | 考研专业试题 | 2008考研招生简章 | 考研图书 | 留言板 | 考研图片中心 | 

设为首页
加入收藏
联系我们

您现在的位置: 考研信息网 >> 考研信息中心 >> 外语类考试首页 >> 雅思IELTS >> 模拟试题 >> 正文 用户登录 新用户注册
2006年5月27日雅思考试高分范文赏析         ★★★ 【字体:
2006年5月27日雅思考试高分范文赏析
2006年5月27日雅思考试高分范文赏析
作者:2006年5月…    文章来源:2006年5月27日雅思考试高分范文赏析    点击数:    更新时间:2006-6-10

本站推荐Firefox浏览器,有效阻止病毒和垃圾弹出[正版免费下载]

2006年5月27日雅思考试高分范文赏析

提示:雅思写作范文仅供参考,不可背诵,更不可应用于实际考试,否则可能因为雷同得到极低的分数,甚至0分。

  Animals were friends or foes of humanity at different stages of the human history. In modern times, experiments upon animals have been a breeding ground for spirited debate. Some animal rights activists argue that we should ban animalexperiments altogether because subjecting animals to experimentation is unwarranted on moral grounds, whereas some other people contend that the advancement of science necessitates animal testing. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view.

  Granted, mounting empirical evidence suggests that many animal experiments are performed callously without any heed to the discomfort or pain that laboratory mammals endure. For one thing, improper confinement of test animals such as locking them up in cramped cages is inhumane; and this, in turn, can severely disrupt natural biological functions of the test animal. For another, the effects of vaccination or vivisection conducted on live mammals can be chilling. In extreme cases, they constitute sheer torture of animals.

  Nevertheless, from a more pragmatic standpoint, evidence abounds that animal subjects are still an indispensable part of scientific research at this phase of human development. In the first place, drug experimentation on live mammals is, indisputably, far more effectual than experimentation on bacteria or on other lower species in determining drug safety. Medical history informs that drugs that can potentially exert grave side effects on homo sapiens must be tested by pharmaceutical companies on live mammals first to ascertain their toxicity. In the second place, in the realm of space research, live animals are still practical alternatives on a flight not considered to be sufficiently safe for human astronauts. And I would be hard-pressed to imagine the scenario that human lives should be put at stake when the objective of a space mission is merely to identify living creatures’ reaction to outer space experience. Lastly, lab research about the behavioral tendencies of chimpanzees, gorillas or other members of the primate group is also a worthy endeavor, in light of the fact that it generates outcomes consistently advancing anthropological and genetic sciences.

  To conclude, I concede that experiments upon animals may induce suffering to the test animals. However, it is generally arguable that there are no practical alternatives to this methodology at the current stage of scientific development. On balance , I am convinced that what we should do is to allow animals testing to be continued but at the same time use techniques such as analgesic, anesthetic and tranquilizing drugs to minimize the pain of the test animal.

  作者简介:Patric老师--旅美多年、深谙欧美文化, 独创“assembly line写作法”,透析雅思写作考试的应试体系,抹去您写作考试中“永远的痛”, 长期执教写作专项训练班和私人雅思课程的培训,造就了一大批的高分学员。

考研信息网在线版权与免责声明

1、 凡本站注明“稿件来源:考研信息网(sanwww.com)”的所有文字、图片和音视频稿件,版权均属本网所有,任何媒体、

网站或个人未经本网协议授权不得转载、转贴或以其他方式复制发表。已经本站协议授权的媒体、网站,在下载使用时

必须注明"稿件来源:sanwww.com",违者本站将依法追究责任。

2、本站注明稿件来源为其他媒体的文/图等稿件均为转载稿,本站转载出于非商业性的教育和科研之目的,并不意味着

赞同其观点或证实其内容的真实性。如转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者在两周内速来电或来函联系。

3、考研试题、各种考试试题以及考试信息转载于各大bbs论坛,就其真实性本站无法证实,并不意味着赞同其观点。

如转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者在两周内速来电或来函联系。

文章录入:admin    责任编辑:admin 
  • 上一篇文章:

  • 下一篇文章: 没有了
  • 发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
           最新热点        最新推荐        相关文章
    没有相关文章
    网友评论:(只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)